Category Archives: criminal law attorney

criminal law attorney

5 Easy Ways To Find A Great Criminal Defense Attorney

It is not always necessary that you are criminal or have committed filing lawsuits crime to require a good legal counsel. When you are looking for a Criminal Defense attorney you should ensure that you find and engage the best you can afford. There are many technicalities, circumstantial evidences, wrong-time wrong-place type scenarios and the like that could put you on a spot without you being guilty of anything. In such cases, here is how you would ensure that you find and get the best criminal defense lawyer there is.

1. Go to the Internet to search for legal counsels who specialize in criminal defense-There is no better place to start your search than the Net. Key in your requirement and it will give you long lists of possible resources. Make a list of the first 10 best sites and then research each one of these eminent sites carefully. You can look for success stories, scams and disgruntled clients, feedback and reviews or testimonials. Each angle will give you free criminal court records insight into the performance of the company and its professionals.

2. Verify credentials-Unless it is a company of national or state repute, do not take anything at face value. Colorado’s award-winning auto accident and personal injury law firm, providing the highest caliber representation with a proven track record of getting results. Our leading Denver personal injury attorneys will move mountains to get you the results you deserve. We are dedicated to our clients and have helped thousands of people throughout Colorado, recovering millions of dollars, and always offering 100% free consultations. Call us today to find out how we can help!You need a great lawyer to defend you whether you are guilty or not. You cannot afford to risk conviction for the moment you are convicted; your life may become a nightmare. This conviction will follow you and harass you in your professional and personal life for a long time.

3. Ask for personal references-Talk with friends, colleagues, family and ask them to refer you to someone they would have already tried or know firsthand. Personal references in such a situation might be a little difficult to get, but if you ask around you would definitely get someone who knows someone who has a father/sister/ brother/ etc that is a great professional in the field. This would be your best bet for two reasons: (i) the reference comes through friends or family members and hence you would get preferential treatment; (ii) since this is firsthand info, you are getting your money’s worth.

4. Ask for interviews-Talk with the proposed professional and watch out for your gut feelings. As with a doctor, you should be extremely comfortable talking and confiding in this person. Unless this professional inspires in your trust settlement claims complete reliance, you better keep looking. Look for signs of confidence (not to be confused with over-confidence) and self-assurance besides professional expertise.

5. Experience-Needless to say that the professional you should hire should be one who has behind him/ her a series of success stories; the discovery in a lawsuit complex the better. If you have to choose between a gold medalist who has just passed out from law school, and one who has some 20 years of practicing behind him/ her, I would go for the one with 20 years experience. This does not mean that the gold medalist is of no use – all theory no practice; rather, it means that you are using the advantage the experienced professional to your benefit.


Attorney General Loretta Lynch Faces Potential Minefield With Hillary Clinton Email Investigation

The latest controversy over Hillary Clinton’s use of about community service personal email system while secretary of state is not only a possible drag on her presidential campaign, but it also creates a potential headache for Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

The inspectors general for the State Department and intelligence community on Friday disclosed that criminal lawsuit lawyers internal review of Clinton’s system concluded some emails contained classified information and that the inspectors general had sent a non-criminal “referral” to the Justice Department over the matter.

Lynch and her department must now determine what to do next — including whether to open a criminal investigation — attorney for lawsuit whatever she decides will be under intense scrutiny, especially by Republicans on Capitol Hill.

“We have recently received some referrals … as we receive referrals on any number of things,” Lynch told ABC News’ Pierre Thomas in an exclusive interview. “We review them and we’ll determine what particular steps, if any, we need to take.”

Before becoming attorney general, Lynch served as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive and proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, federal lawsuit search understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.It was her second time in the position, having been first appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1999.

Lynch declined to say whether her connection to the Clintons creates a conflict of interest for her now.

The intelligence community referred the matter to the Justice Department mainly because it was concerned that classified information could be compromised after being sent over unsecured networks and then put in the hands of Clinton’s legal team, a spokesman for medical suit intelligence community’s inspector general told ABC News.

The purpose of notifying the Justice Department was to inform the FBI of “a potential compromise of classified information,” not to seek a criminal probe, spokeswoman Andrea Williams said.

In a recent memorandum to the State Department’s Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, the inspectors general said a review of Clinton’s emails revealed “hundreds of potentially classified emails within the collection.

Williams said the intelligence community found four emails out of a batch of 40 that it reviewed containing classified information, though they were not marked as such.

Clinton on Saturday brushed off the new investigation, saying she was confident she hadn’t received or sent anything that was classified at the time.

ABC News’ Justin Fishel, Jack Date, Jack Cloherty, Audrey Taylor and Geneva Sands contributed to this report.

— This embed didnt make it to copy for story id = 32691620.

SAG-AFTRA Pays For Staff Car Washes, State Bar Dues For In-House Attorneys & More

SAG-AFTRA likes its employees to drive clean shiny cars. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive and proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, and understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.It spent almost $9,200 to have their cars washed over the last year, according to the unions latest financial report filed with the U.S. Department of Labor. police misconduct lawyers car wash it uses, located in a high-rise next to the unions headquarters on Wilshire Boulevard, charges $20-$25 per wash, which comes out to about 400 car washes a year, not including tips.

The union has found all kinds of other pricey ways to spend its members dues money, lavishing its employees with $73,389 in contributions, gifts and grants, and spending $8,475 to pay the state bar dues of 20 of its in-house attorneys. It spent court ordered community service than $83,000 for coffee service and another $43,332 on catering services.

The guild also spent over $1 million on political activities and lobbying, free court documents another $1.2 million to be affiliated with the AFL-CIO.</how to file suit in federal court>

Criminal law attorney Michael Cardoza speaks on Santa Cruz Maddy Middleton case

Related Coverage

SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) Neighborswho knew the suspect in the Maddy Middleton case said they were shocked of the 15-year-old boys arrest.

Criminal law attorney Michael Cardoza joined Pam Moore in <a href=””>the studio to talk about the case.

He was asked the following questions:

Are you surprised that the suspect is not only young, but someone who knew Maddy?

Prosecutors are deciding whether to charge him as adult.. What goes into that decision?

Because the suspect is so young, what is the process here? Will he be held in juvenile detentionuntil he reaches adult age?

Do you think a jury will be swayed < href=”″>by suspects age?

How do you defend a client of this age for murder?


http://kron4. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, and understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a

Four indicted in U.S. for fraud in Dewey & LeBoeuf collapse | Reuters

NEW YORK Less than a month after writing that he did not want to “cook the books anymore,” but facing a deadline to show lenders that Dewey & LeBoeuf had enough cash, the law firm’s top finance executive emailed a colleague that he “came up with a big one,” according to investigators.

“You always do in the last hours,” the law firm’s executive director Stephen DiCarmine replied to the December 29, 2008 email from chief financial officer Joel Sanders, according to investigators. “That’s why we get the extra 10 or 20% bonus.”

The communications and other evidence are the basis of criminal and civil charges announced in New York on Thursday in which the law firm’s former leaders are accused of accounting gimmicks and fraud to cheat banks and investors in a failed attempt to keep their prestigious law firm alive.

Dewey & LeBoeuf once had as many as 1,400 lawyers, before going bankrupt in May 2012. Its collapse is the largest of a U.S. law firm, costing thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars of estimated losses for banks, lenders and investors.

declaratory judgement action 106-count indictment from Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. charges former Dewey & LeBoeuf chairman Steven Davis, 60, DiCarmine, 57, and Sanders, 55, with several dozen felonies each, including grand larceny, securities fraud and falsifying business records.

Former client relations manager Zachary Warren, 29, was also criminally charged with helping to start the fraud and cover up its early stages.

All four men pleaded not guilty on Thursday in Manhattan criminal court, which they entered in handcuffs. Davis was carrying a paperback book while DiCarmine and Sanders, who live in Florida, appeared to have suntans.

Davis lives in London, England, and agreed to travel restrictions. Bail was set on Thursday at $2 million for Davis, DiCarmine and Sanders, and $200,000 for Warren.

Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Peirce Moser told State Supreme Court Justice Robert Stolz that the men “acted out of a shocking mix of greed and hubris.”

Separately, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil fraud lawsuit against five former Dewey & LeBoeuf officials: Davis, DiCarmine, Sanders, finance director Frank Canellas, 34, and controller Thomas Mullikin, 43, for cheating 13 insurers in a $150 million bond offering in 2010.

At a press conference, Vance said Dewey’s finance department ran a “blatant accounting fraud and deceit” at the direction of the firm’s top management, and that officials gave false information to the law firm’s auditor, Ernst & Young. Ernst & Young spokeswoman Amy Call Well declined to comment.

Vance said this went on even as Davis was authorizing “generous” salaries and bonuses for top lieutenants, while many other law firm employees were seeing their pay go down.

Seven people, whose names have not been publicly disclosed, have already pleaded guilty in the case, and the investigation is continuing, Vance said.


Dewey & LeBoeuf was formed in a 2007 merger of two New York law firms, Dewey Ballantine and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae.

Prosecutors said the evidence shows attempts to head off the firm’s possible collapse, as it found itself unable to cut costs fast enough to combat a plunge in revenue and mounting debt following the financial crisis.

Many of the problems arose from the big pay packages that had been guaranteed to dozens of partners, to a degree atypical in the legal industry.

These payouts often went to partners who did not produce enough revenue to justify them, spurring resentment and eventually mass defections from partners who were missing out.

The “Dewey” in the firm’s name was Thomas Dewey, the former New York governor and Republican presidential candidate.

Vance unveiled grand larceny, fraud and other felony charges (read the indictment here) against former chairman Steven Davis, 60, former executive director Stephen DiCarmine, 57, and former chief financial officer Joel Sanders, 55. A fourth defendant, client relations manager Zachary Warren, 29, was also criminally charged (read the indictment here)

Separately, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil fraud charges (read the complaint here) against Davis, DiCarmine, Sanders and two other former Dewey officials, finance director Frank Canellas, 34, and controller Thomas Mullikin, 43, saying they misled investors in a 2010 bond offering.

Elkan Abramowitz, a lawyer for Davis, said his client’s actions as chairman “were taken in good faith in an effort to make the firm a success.”

DiCarmine’s and Sanders’ respective lawyers, Austin Campriello and Edward Little, said the charges reflect a bid by prosecutors to find a “scapegoat” for the law firm’s collapse.

Warren’s lawyer, Steve Hyman, declined to comment.

Lawyers for Canellas and Mullikin did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


Investigators said the fraud began in late 2008, when Dewey executives began misrepresenting the law firm’s compliance with cash flow and other loan covenants.

Prosecutors accused Davis, DiCarmine and Sanders of covering their tracks by misclassifying revenue and expenses to make Dewey’s books look better, and trying to backdate checks.

The men were also accused by Vance of having stolen nearly $200 million from 13 insurers and two financial institutions.

Evidence included a note from Sanders to two employees after he had learned in 2011 that Dewey did not write off millions of dollars of a troubled client’s receivables.

“We need to hide this actually writing it off,” Sanders allegedly wrote, according to Vance.

The SEC case focuses on the regulator’s allegations that investors were misled about Dewey’s finances in marketing materials for the 2010 bond offering, which it said was conducted “to alleviate the burden of its crushing debt.”

Among its evidence was a schedule of proposed cost cuts that was labeled “Accounting Tricks,” and DiCarmine’s hopes for a larger bonus.

“We’ll buy a ski house next. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive and proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, and understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.Just need to keep the ship afloat,” DiCarmine wrote to Sanders, according to the SEC.

Dewey’s lenders have included JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup Inc’s private banking unit, Bank of America Corp and HSBC Holdings Plc.

“Investors were led to believe they were purchasing bonds issued by a prestigious law firm that had weathered the financial crisis and was poised for growth,” SEC enforcement chief Andrew Ceresney said.

He called the bond sale “a desperate grasp for cash.”

The SEC is seeking civil fines and to recoup illegal gains.

The cases are New York v. Davis et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, and SEC v. Davis et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 14-1528.

(Additional reporting by Dena Aubin; Editing by Grant McCool)

Sentencing For Vandalism

What is Vandalism?

Anciently, vandalism was described as the ruthless destruction or spoiling of anything beautiful or venerable including defacement, graffiti and criminal damage.

Today, vandalism is described as the willful damage or defacement of the property of others or the commons without permission.

What Acts are Considered Vandalism?

The destruction of glass windows and doorsDefacement or destruction of political or marketing signageSalting lawns, cutting trees without permission, egg and toilet paper throwing, arson, spraying paint on others’ properties, tagging, gluing locks, tire slashing, keying (scratching) paint, ransacking a property and flooding a house by clogging a sink and leaving the water runningDamaging monuments or statues, National Parks, mailboxes, USPS boxesDamaging street signs with bullet holesGraffiti of any sortCarving into wood, stone or a tree with a knife

Who Gets What Punishment?


Adults’ punishments for vandalism are based upon such facts as the dollar amount of the damage done and the vandal’s past history, such as prior convictions. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive and proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, and understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.If the dollar amount is between $250 and $2,000, the crime is a class 6 felony. If the vandal is discovered with drugs, for example, there may be additional charges resulting in more than one sentencing.If the damage is less than $250 it is considered a class 2 misdemeanor.The severity and amount of the damage determines whether the crime is a class 6 felony which includes fines of up to $150.000 and <trial court cases href=””>a year of jail time. A class 2 misdemeanor carries a fine of not more than $1,500 and six months in jail.


For first-time offenders, the punishment may be community service hours cleaning up graffiti, tagging or other types of vandalism. I t is considered a misdemeanor and generally includes making restitution to the property owner.If it is not the juvenile’s first offense, sentencing will be stiffer and may include fines and jail time such as detention in a juvenile facility and up to 3 years of probation. The severity of the crime and the specific target of the vandalism also drive sentencing.Courts often include fines of $500 or lawyers lawsuit, expulsion from school and counseling.The courts hope that first-time offenders will be forever deterred from vandalism after completion of their sentences. In many cases, this works.Juveniles are assured that vandalism is not a harmless prank or a brave rite of passage, but serious crimes that carry heavy penalties depending of the specific target of vandalism.The bottom line admonition to juveniles is “If you do not own it, do not deface it. Vandalism is a crime. It may be a Federal, State or Municipal court that will determine punishment.

Top 5 San Diego, CA Criminal Defense Lawyers

Federal Criminal Offenses are very serious and carry extreme consequences if you are convicted. If you are accused of a crime in the San Diego, CA, area, or you have been charged with a criminal offense, you need to locate the best possible Criminal Defense Lawyer. Finding the right one can be a challenge, however, because there are hundreds of Criminal Defense Lawyers in this region.

To begin your search for the top 5 San Diego California Criminal Defense Lawyers, we have set forth a few important points to help narrow down your options. Here are some points to consider when selecting your Criminal Defense Lawyer:

Having a winning track record is important, of course.

Affordability should be a secondary issue when your freedom is at stake.

Knowledge and experience are gained over time, and it is reasonable to believe that an attorney with more years of practice behind them would be a better choice than small claims court recent law school graduate.

An attorney with experience at the Federal Court level is likely to also know personally more judges and other high-level attorneys; this can be helpful for winning cases. Federal crimes are very serious; Federal courts also have special rules of procedures.

Another factor to consider is law firm size; larger firms may have more resources, but a smaller firm is more likely to give you individual time and attention. The smaller, younger and newer law firm may also be criminal lawsuit lawyers aggressive in their quest for a win.

After balancing the above points to consider, here is our list of the top 5 Criminal Defense Lawyers in San Diego:

#1 Michael S. Berg has 33 years of experience in Criminal Defense Law. His AVVO peer rankingĀ of 10.0 is the top ranking. A Certified Specialist in Criminal Law, he is a member of the State Bar of California and Board of Legal Specialization. Our Team of Legal Experts Focus on Your Rights & Trying to Dismiss Your Charges Why Us; Years of Proven Experience, Aggressive and proactive approach, High degree of skill, experience, and understanding, Top-quality legal advice and representation, Protect Your Rights, Negotiate Strong Plea Bargains, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.His experience includes being the lead attorney in 38 murder cases. With an excellent reputation for success, he has been trusted to handle the defense in criminal cases against judges and wives and children of judges. Attorney Michael S. Berg has been named “Super Lawyer” for the last 8 years in a row. You can discuss your case with Michael at a free consultation. Contact Attorney Michael S. Berg at his law office, 401 W A St, Ste 2600, San Diego, CA 92101, or call (619) 239-2186.

Featured Youtube Video

#2 Charles Martin Sevilla has 25 years Criminal Defense experience, and possesses the highest peer ratings at Martindale Hubbell, AV Preeminent 5.0, and AVVO 10.0. His specialties include Criminal Law and Appellate practice. He has been listed in the “Best Lawyers in America” for 25 years and in multiple years as “The Best Lawyers in San Diego” at San Diego Magazine. With extensive knowledge of this area of law practice, he has authored several books, and is co-author of a text book about criminal defense that is used throughout the country by law schools and attorneys. His experience includes service as a Federal Public Defender, Chief Trial Attorney (San Diego Federal Public Defender) and Chief Deputy State Public Defender for California. Attorney Charles Martin Sevilla has argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and California Supreme Court. Attorney Sevilla also offers a free consultation. Contact him at The Law Offices of Charles Sevilla, 1010 Second Avenue, Suite 1825, San Diego, CA 92101, or call (619) 232-2222.

#3 Marc Geller has 42 years Criminal Defense experience and has personal knowledge of every Judge in Federal Court. He holds the highest AVVO peer rating of 10.0. He has in-depth experience with appellate courts, having argued over fifty cases, and he has presented three cases before the United States Supreme Court. To discuss your concerns with Attorney Mark Geller, contact him at Marc B. Geller, APC, 1010 2nd Ave #1829, San Diego, CA, or phone (619) 239-9456.

#4 Jason Thomas Conforti has established his reputation as a rising star in the San Diego Area with 6 years experience. He has an AVVO peer rating of 5.0. A 2009 graduate of the University of San Diego, he focuses about 75% of his services on Criminal Defense, 15% on federal Crime and 5% each on White Collar Crimes and DUI/DWI cases. He has experience representing clients charged with Federal Crimes, including Drug Crimes, Fraud, RICO Act violations and other serious offences. He has had Rising Star Nominations from Super Lawyers each year from 2011 through 2014. Learn more about his legal services by contacting Attorney Jason Thomas Conforti at the Law Office of Jason T. Conforti, 401 West A Street, Suite 1675, San Diego, CA, 92101-3357, or phone (619) 493-3920.

#5 Melissa Bobrow has been licensed to practice Criminal Defense Law for 6 years, since 2009. She holds a top peer rating at AVVO of 10.0. She has experience representing clients in federal courts for a variety of offenses, from minor charges to serious felonies. She spends about 75% of her time on Criminal Defense cases, and 25% on Federal cases. In recognition of her legal skills, Attorney Melissa Bobrow was named a rising star at Super Lawyers in 2015, Best of the Bar in 2014 by the San Diego Business Journal, and as a Top Attorney (2014) and Top Young Attorney Nominee in 2013 by the San Diego Daily Transcript. She graduated from the California Western School of Law in 2007. Attorney Bobrow works with clients individually, and gives each client all the time necessary to prepare and present their case for trial. Contact her at The Law Office of Melissa Bobrow, 964 Fifth Avenue, Suite 207, San Diego, CA 92101 for your free consultation. Telephone: (619) 908-1595.

There are several research websites that rank California Attorneys. Most also include client or peer review comments, educational history, participation in bar associations and other contributions the attorney has made within the legal community.

These lawyer directory and rating websites offer an excellent starting point for finding the right type of Criminal Defense Attorney needed for your case:

Select a couple of highly rated and qualified lawyers from these ratings websites and then request a free consultation. At this meeting, you want to determine if you can work with your choice. Make a list of questions to ask, and then you should be ready to decide which attorney you feel will be the best for your case. There are hundreds of highly qualified Criminal Defense Attorneys in the San Diego area; our list is an excellent starting point.

Remember that Federal offenses are the most serious crimes; your freedom and future will be in the hands of the Criminal Defense Attorney that you select. Choose wisely and carefully; if there are problems, do not be afraid to switch to another attorney. Penalties for convictions may include jail or prison time, high fines, and harm to your reputation that will stick with you long into your future. Always consult with a skilled Criminal Defense Attorney if you have already been convicted; you may be entitled to filing lawsuit appeal to reduce or eliminate that conviction.